Subway Series strips the mystery away

jeter_250.jpgSUBWAY AGAIN (AGAIN)
It’s time for another tired interleague match-up. I realize that I’m acting the wet blanket, but after years of record-distorting play and such scintillating league crossovers as Astros-Royals, it seems to me that a great deal of the attraction of any interleague rivalry, particularly Yankees-Mets, was the impossibility of ever resolving the debate, because Don Mattingly and Keith Hernandez were never going to be in the same game together short of the odd spring training confrontation. The argument could never resolve and everybody could be right–unless, the tantalizing, always just out of reach World Series confrontation materialized. Then it would all be settled at the highest possible level, under the greatest possible tension.

Interleague play stripped the mystery away. Now we know that most meetings between the Yankees and Mets are just like any other game. Maybe the fans feel a bit more jazzed than usual, but in the end, the only thing at stake are some empty bragging rights, now immutably concretized in the drab facts of the box score, and the usual one-game-in-the-standings stakes. In the latter case, the stakes are no different than any midweek game against the Orioles. By the time the two teams finally did meet in a World Series, interleague play had let the air out of the confrontation–it was nothing we hadn’t seen before, as recently as that July.

So here we are again, 12 days after the last time. Admittedly, the last time was exciting, or at the very least strange, with Luis Castillo’s inexplicable dropped pop-up, the unheralded comeback of Fernando Nieve (“comeback” might be a misnomer given that he was never really here), and an unprecedented battering of Johan Santana. Parenthetically, since striking out 11 in six innings against the Nats on May 27, Santana hasn’t struck out more than three batters in any start; in 30.1 innings, his strikeout rate is 4.2 per nine. The Yankees won’t be seeing Santana this series, so that’s just a point of interest.

The Yankees will be seeing Mike Pelfrey (tonight vs. Sabathia), old pal Tim Reddding (Saturday vs. Burnett), and Livan Hernandez (vs. Wang). Pelfrey is a really interesting case. The 2005 first-rounder had a breakthrough season last year, but this season has been choppy to say the least, with his strikeout rate dying a tormented, painful death. Despite this, he was was winning thanks to decent run support. Beginning with his second start of May, he reeled off five very solid appearances, limiting batters to just six walks and one home run in 34.2 innings. His strikeout rate bounced back up into the fours, which isn’t good but was sustainable given the high number of ground balls he was getting. He was, shall we say, Wang-ing it. Just as quickly as they came, the  good times ended, June bringing a 7.08 ERA as Pelfrey’s control has wandered, giving hitters more chances to put the ball in play with runners on. Nor has the Mets’ defense done him any favors in this period.

Redding you know from his brief pinstriped experience, a journeyman with a capital “R” for “Replacement level.” He was actually a bit better than that last year, but not by much. This year he’s back in the submarine, sailing below the surface of useful. He’s given the Mets three quality starts in seven tries, but remains a fly ball pitcher without a strikeout pitch, a very bad combination. Hernandez was roughed up by the Yankees in Castillo’s dropped-egg game. What I said then remains true now: his pitching as well as he has was wholly unexpected given just how badly he was treated in both leagues last year. Despite his low-ish ERA, he remains very hittable, averaging 10 safeties per nine innings pitched, and his home run rate is on the high side. He’s pitched well in two starts since the Yankees last saw him.

There is no reason that the Yankees could not sweep this series given the pitching matchups, but that was also true of the Nationals series and we know how that went. However, the Mets are at a further disadvantage, because their many injuries have reduced their list of star-level players to just one — David Wright. He can be enough–he went 5-for-12 against the Yankees the last time around, and has continued to hit well since. However, his power continues to be mystifyingly absent–it has now been 15 games since his last home run. During that stretch he has hit .383 with five doubles, and only four RBIs.

The most remarkable aspect to Wright’s season is that he continues to have a batting average on balls in play of nearly .500 (currently it’s .469). A high percentage of his balls in play, 27 percent, are line drives, which would correlate with a high BABIP, but not this high. In comparison, Scott Rolen has a higher line drive rate and his BABIP is only .354, while Jason Bartlett is leading the majors with an almost 30 percent of his balls in play being liners and his BABIP is “only” .405. It is extremely likely that Bartlett’s BABIP will decline as the year goes on, perhaps by 70 or 100 points, and spectacularly likely that Wright’s will fall off by even more. That leaves the Mets with an interesting problem, because if Wright’s NL-leading average has been due to an overlarge share of luck, and not due to a change in approach by the batter, purposeful or otherwise, then when did his power go, and what happens to his production when some of the singles start to get caught?

As we will likely see tonight when the Yankees put balls in the air and watch what would have been home runs in the Bronx ballpark settle harmlessly into gloves, some of the power outage has been engendered by the Mets zombie tribute to Ebbets Field (ironically, a bandbox–Mickey Mantle used to say, and he meant this, that he would have hit a thousand home runs had he played there), but not all of it, as Wright has hit but one home run on the road this year.


After a 1-for-6 on Thursday, Nick Swisher apparently gets a mental health break today. It seems as if his place in the lineup is safe, however, as Xavier Nady has had a major setback in his rehab. No confirmation of the damage yet, and I’ll reserve comment until we get the straight dope. I’m waiting for someone to hit my inbox with “Melky should be the everyday right fielder.” It hasn’t come yet, but it will. 


  1. sadaharuo

    To quote John Sterling:
    “I think Swisher is a very underrated outfielder”

    And just to be clear, he was talking about Swisher’s defense.

  2. jeff1112

    sadaharuo, I agree Swisher surprised me with his defensive abilities. The guy isn’t afraid to go out and get the ball and try and make tough or body compromising plays.

    In regard to Nady I feel really bad for the guy. This injury really hurts his career. Not playing much right before a FA year doesn’t help and if he is forced to get TJ surgery he has lost a total of 2-2.5 years of playing time due to this injury in what would be the prime of his career. I wouldn’t fault the Yankees for it, but the trade last year for Nady and Marte has turned out to be a total bust. At least they didn’t give up any major pieces for those two. At least Karstens and Ohlendorf have gotten the chance to contribute to a team in the majors even if they haven’t been very good.


    Melky should be the everyday right fielder. On some other team when we trade him for a better 3B backup.

  4. sadaharuo

    Er…I was kidding. I was actually mocking Sterling’s praise of Swisher’s defense. Earlier in the game he also lauded Johnny Damon’s defense. Both of these players have been a train wreck in the outfield, but Sterling thinks they’ve played great.

  5. jeff1112

    While he isn’t amazing, you gotta admit Swisher has played better defense than Abreu did last year. At this point Damon should be limited to the DH role and occasional play in LF, Matsui and his two bum knees are clogging up that spot.

    Its a case of when they make a good play these guys are great, but when they don’t they don’t deserve to be out there.

    I’m really curious about what they do in the OF next year, but they gotta worry about getting the best out of the guys they have this year.


    Mr. Goldman, everything you say about interleague is truev but it’s even worse than that.
    The press was able virtually to ruin what was actually a riveting 2000 WS, virtually ignoring the dramatic games in favor of turning the whole thing into a Jerry Springer disaster, tying one unpleasant moment in game 1 to interleague history that shouldn’t have been there and never, ever letting it go.

    Swisher is shockingly inelegant, but all of his defensive metrics are just as shockingly good. He’s getting to a lot of balls and making most of the plays. He often looks bad doing it, and he looks positively horrific when failing to do it, but overall the numbers say that casual observation is deceiving. Once again, it seems, Swisher’s a very, very valuable player who seems to know every trick in the book for getting himself undervalued.


    Is it just me or is Brett Gardner starting to look like a real keeper. Rookie of the Year is starting to come into consideration and I would have laughed at that 2 months ago.

  8. letsgoyankees

    Am I the only person who likes interleague play?
    I don’t think Damon’s terrible defensively, but I do think Swishy is. UZR is an awful stat.

  9. letsgoyankees

    In regards to Wright, it’s possible that he’ll just have a very lucky season andwin batting title. Then it’ll all even out next year.

  10. dwnflfan

    Oh no, they mystery is gone!

    If only the Ted Williams Red Sox had never faced the DiMaggio Yankees, think of all the mystery the fact that the two teams were in the same league ruined! Woe on to us poor baseball fans who are forced to stomach the Astros-Royals series instead of being thrilled by yet another Astros-Reds series.

    Just to make my sentiments clear, “mystery”, does not outweigh the opportunity I’ve been given to see the Yankees the face off against some of the best the NL has to offer. Even facing teams like the Marlins, Astros & Pirates offer a nice change of pace compared to facing a bad AL that we’ve all seen 50 times.

    Your contention that now games between the Yankees & Mets don’t mean anything more than a mid-week game vs. the Orioles is obviously ridiculous. Yankee fans start talking about the upcoming series vs. the Mets weeks in advance and vice-versa. It’s been a solid decade since Yankee fans anticipated a series against the O’s for anything more than an opportunity to gain ground in the standings. So what if the 2000 series featured two teams that had met before? The Yankees and Red Sox face each other 18 times this year. I guess if they face off in the ALCS everyone will say, “So what, we’ve seen this before.”

    OBTW – Since when are bragging rights, “empty”? Bragging rights are the ONLY reason there is major league baseball.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s